|[back to articles]|
|This has the potential of destroying the monopoly held by the private corporation called "The Law Society".|
|Sep 16, 2007|
|Trueman Vs Judges & Lawyers > Solutions - Canadian Law Societies|
From: "Denis" <email@example.com >
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" < email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:56:45 -0700
Hi everyone, from David Butterfield
September 20th & 21st - 9:30 a.m.
"REGINA V. JOHN KRIST"
A Huge case in the
Supreme Court of B.C.
651 Carnarvon Street
This case is about a man attempting to realize his Human Rights, as enshrined in International Laws and, in particular, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratified by "Canada" in August 1976. The Attorney General of Canada/Prosecutor and the Judges and Justices of the Courts are totally ignorant of the obligations accepted by "Canada" through its ratification of these international instruments. In other words, and especially in light of the Supreme Court of B.C. Rule # 19.10, the Attorney General and these courts are violating Human Rights everyday of the week.
They have continued to deny him his Rights through more than a year in each the Provincial and now Supreme Courts. They have actually forced this man to make an informal Application to the Court to be allowed to exercise his Human Rights, can you believe it. Of course you can.
One of the Rights this individual is attempting to exercise is to have "legal assistance of his own choosing". Now before you think this doesn't apply to you, I will tell you that you are wrong. Human Rights are absolutely Supreme and cannot be overridden or subverted by any so-called "law" made by man. Further, before you start assuming that "legal assistant" has something to do with a "Lawyer/Agent/Lay Litigate/Lay Counsel" or any other such "legal fiction", know this, these international instruments are all written with words carrying their plain language meanings. In other words, the words of these instruments cannot be interpreted pursuant to any legal definition or definition provided in any Domestic statute. Only the definitions provided in English language dictionaries apply. A "legal assistant" is therefore, someone with knowledge of law who is willing to be an aid or helper in the presenting of the facts of the case. This has the potential of destroying the monopoly held by the private corporation called "The Law Society".
Further still, this matter has been dragged on (by errors made by the Attorney General), for more than 2 1/2 years since the charges were laid.
Their own corporate "Supreme Court of Canada" has determined that six months is a "reasonable period of time" to get the matter to trial.
An incredible amount of Truth is being brought out through this proceeding and the Affidavits that have been filed to date. Wait until his Jury hears it all, if it does get that far. The "CROWN" is apparently afraid that it is I, David Butterfield, who would be the "legal assistant of his own choosing". Even if you don't believe you will ever have to rely on this particular Human Right, you must read the attached files to the purpose of expanding your own level of knowledge relative to the question present in everyone's mind: "what's wrong with this picture". Of course the best thing would be to attend and allow yourself to witness that picture becoming perfectly clear, right before your eyes.
Without your Human Rights, you have none, so please, come and show support for Human Rights and this man who has put himself on the line in attempt to finally cause the corporate governments de facto to act in compliance with these international instruments of Human Rights Law and allow us all to realize them. There is only one set of Human Rights and they belong to us all, without any form of discrimination or distinction. Everyone has the Right and Responsibility to Educate and Defend our Human Rights.
Remember, the only Rights you've got are those you know and exercise.
Discover sweet stuff waiting for you at the Messenger Cafe. Claim your treat today!
|[back to articles]|